Man-ifesto, Needs Context

December 16, 2009 by  
Filed under Blog, Virtue

Dockers Man-ifesto 1A message about the Docker’s “Man-ifesto” came through my inbox today and I wanted to draw some attention to it.  The point of what Dockers is trying to do comes across, however, I think it needs some explanation in order to make it better.  This explanation sets the context of what manhood is, why it is vital and how a man can live TrueManhood.

I really like the parts about gentlemanly behavior.  I tend to believe that chivalry is dying, but I know that it can be resurrected from the dead if men would take a few extra seconds here and there to help women out (it needs to then become a mindset) AND if women allow a man to be a gentleman.  The loss of masculinity in our culture is overwhelming, which is a big reason why I operate this website.  Males tend to give into societal pressures (vanity and pride are big here) and because of the idea of “cultural manliness” (if you don’t know what this is, you need to read more of my writings here!  Use the search box to find CULTURAL MANLINESS!) are often rewarded for doing so.  If you haven’t heard Brad Paisley’s song, “I’m Still a Guy”, he mentions lots of stuff about the decline of masculinity: “These days, there’s dudes gettin’ facials, manicured, waxed and botoxed.  With deep spray on tans, and creamy-lotiony hands, you can’t grip a tackle box.  With all of these dudes linin’ up get nudered it’s hip now to be feminized…” It’s funny, haha, but true.  A way for us to gauge our own behavior and motivations is to look at the most manly men we know.  This doesn’t mean Chuck Norris and Charleston Heston, this means TrueMen, like St. Joseph, St. Thomas More and Jesus Himself!  These men exemplify manliness, they are our guides.

The Dockers Man-ifesto takes jabs at stuff like salad bars, misbehaved children and complacency, but it never answers the question ‘why’.

The term “wear the pants” is typically misconstrued and misused; typically the term means something similar to dominate, or rule over.  This is NOT the role of a man.  A TrueMan leads, yes, but not with an iron fist.  A TrueMan makes decisions, but not by force.  A TrueMan loves and honors and respects.  (In the coming days, as soon as I have my voice back, I’m producing a video talking more about this topic.)

And let’s be clear, the “call to manhood” is to live virtue!  In Latin, virtus means manliness!

I urge men and women to read through Docker’s Man-ifesto and determine what areas should be worded differently if it was the TrueMan-ifesto.  Maybe I’ll do that too, and post my thoughts on it.  Your comments are appreciated.

Man up!

Comments

One Response to “Man-ifesto, Needs Context”
  1. Jen says:

    Dave,
    Thanks for posting this. I understand your comments. I enjoyed the Man-ifesto. I was interested to see a public company saying something like this in a society of tolerance and political correctness. I think Dockers/Levis has a point.

    You bring up an interesting topic aside from the Manifesto and I would love to hear you thoughts. I know you are a bold man, living loud and proud for Our Lord, Jesus Christ. I am not always around men such as yourself. I want to urge my brothers to chivalry and I think there are small ways for me to do this. However, what are some concrete ways that I can allow me to be chivalrous? Should I stand in front of a door waiting for my male friend to open it or should I just open it? What if he does not know much about chivalry and is just learning? I would love your thoughts.

    Love your site. Keep it up!

    Jen